United States v. Taylor
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. Brosman, Judge:
Following trial by a general court-martial convened in Japan, the accused was found guilty under a specification alleging that, on February 20, 1951, he had fraudulently enlisted in the United States Army. Charges on which the trial was predicated were not preferred until March 1953. The convening authority approved and a board of review has affirmed the findings and the sentence rendered thereon. This Court granted the accused’s petition for review for the purpose of determining whether prosecution was barred by the statute of limitations, and, if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Bridges v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. GraingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. AyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. JenkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. MooreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. ShellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. HutchinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. ProsperiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.