Legal Opinion
United States v. Prosperi
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 29, 2008No. Criminal 06-10116-RGSPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN COUNTS OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT AS TIME-BARRED
STEARNS, District Judge.
In this case, the court is asked to determine whether the United States is presently at war, and if so, with whom. Defendants are charged with conspiracy, mail fraud, and the making of false statements in connection with the federally-financed Central Artery Tunnel Project (CA/T). Defendants’ criminal acts are alleged to have begun in 1999. The indictment was returned on May 3, 2006, and superseded on June 28, 2006. 1 On June 29, 2007, defendants moved to…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. Steven FredianaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. David PflugerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. BNP Paribas SADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- United States v. ArnoldDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.