Legal Opinion

United States v. Grainger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1953No. 634PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton

These cases were argued immediately following No. 548, Bridges v. United States, ante, p. 209. They concern the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act which we found inapplicable to the offenses stated in the Bridges indictment. These cases, however, involve different offenses and we hold the Suspension Act applicable to the instant indictments for offenses committed in 1945 and 1946 and we hold that the United States may thus prosecute them in 1952.

The principal questions here are: (1) whether the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act 2 suspended the running of the general three-year statute…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. SchartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Amos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. Jerome H. Moore and Mildred v. Moore v. United States of America, Jerome H. Moore and Mildred v. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. William Lee WorkingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Walter B. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API