Turner v. Markham
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wright, Bell & Ward, Benjamin Page, and Walter Trask, for H. H. Markham, Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, a stockholder of the American Boy Gold Mining Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Arizona, for and on behalf of the corporation, against the defendants Markham, its president and general manager, and Coffin, its secretary, to recover moneys alleged to have been misappropriated, and the value of stock of the corporation alleged to have been wrongfully issued to and taken by the defendants. Judgment was given against the defendants for $116,842.81 for moneys found to have been misappropriated and for the value of stock of the corporation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Davenport v. DowsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Scadden Flat Gold Mining Co. v. ScaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Kellerman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Tamalpais Land & Water Co. v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Mueller v. MacBanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.