Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 112, Afl-Cio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1993No. 91-70326PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) applies for enforcement of its second supplemental decision and order issued against the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 112, AFL-CIO (the “Union”). The Board’s order requires the Union to pay four journeymen electricians the sum of $241,830.15, to compensate them for losses of pay suffered because of the Union’s discrimination against them in hiring hall dispatch decisions. We affirm.
Facts and Proceedings
The Union is located in the Tri-Cities area of Washington state (Richland, Kennewick, and Pasco). On May 23, 1984, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wallace Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America, Local 1913Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Howard Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Airport Parking Management v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Airport Parking ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gary A. Bloom v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- National Labor Relations Board v. Alwin Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- National Labor Relations Board v. Midwestern Personnel Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Beverly California Corp v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Cornele Overstreet v. Shamrock Foods CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.