Legal Opinion

Tindall v. Bryan

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1949No. 5207PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

Appellee moves to dismiss this appeal on grounds which he claims are jurisdictional.

First, he urges that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal because the statute conferring appellate jurisdiction in this court has been repealed. This raises the question whether Chapter 175, Laws of 1947, which repeals the law conferring appellate jurisdiction in this court is valid.

In 1917 the Legislature passed the general appellate-procedure act, Chapter 43, which reads as follows:

“Section 1. Within six months from the entry of any final judgment in any civil action, any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Johnson v. GreinerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. ShollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Conley v. DavidsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Robinson v. T. D. Neal Mercantile Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Barelas Community Ditch Corp. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Garcia v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API