Robinson v. T. D. Neal Mercantile Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SIMMS, J.
Appellees move to dismiss this appeal on grounds which they claim are jurisdictional.
First, they say that no notice of appeal was given by appellant, as required by section 2, rule 5, Rules of Appellate Procedure, within five days after taking the appeal. It appears that a certain notice, properly captioned and entitled in the correct cause, was served by mail three days after the appeal was taken, but the body of the notice contained what was evidently a typographical error, in that it stated that a stranger to the record, by name, was taking the appeal. Failure…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farmers' Cotton Finance Corp. v. GreenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Conley v. DavidsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Tindall v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Crabtree v. Board of Com'rs of Socorro CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Wilson v. RuthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930