Legal Opinion
Conley v. Davidson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1929No. 3475PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Appellee moves dismissal of this, appeal on the sole ground that the five days’ notice required by App. Proc. Rule V, § 1, was riot given. ■ He showed no prejudice, and the notice omitted is not jurisdictional. We have therefore overruled the motion, under App. Proc. Rule XIV, § 3.
It is so ordered.
PARKER and CATRON, JJ., did not participate.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Tindall v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Robinson v. T. D. Neal Mercantile Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Crabtree v. Board of Com'rs of Socorro CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Wilson v. RuthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930