Legal Opinion

Conley v. Davidson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1929No. 3475PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellee moves dismissal of this, appeal on the sole ground that the five days’ notice required by App. Proc. Rule V, § 1, was riot given. ■ He showed no prejudice, and the notice omitted is not jurisdictional. We have therefore overruled the motion, under App. Proc. Rule XIV, § 3.

It is so ordered.

PARKER and CATRON, JJ., did not participate.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Tindall v. BryanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Robinson v. T. D. Neal Mercantile Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Crabtree v. Board of Com'rs of Socorro CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Wilson v. RuthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930