Schilling v. Stockel
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The Negligence Problem.
The jury found Mr. Schilling 50 percent negligent for driving with his left elbow protruding from the window next to the driver’s seat of his automobile. Upon appeal, it is contended that there could be no negligence on the part of Mr. Schilling because of the extraordinary way that the injury occurred.
If the plaintiff’s left arm had been struck by a passing vehicle, the jury would have decided the negligence question, and there probably would have been little difficulty in ordering judgment based on such determination. A few cases in other jurisdictions have taken the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Antoniewicz v. ReszczynskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bowen v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.