Legal Opinion
Logiurato v. Action
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 29, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-518PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.
Before the Court are Motions for Partial Summary Judgment and Summary Judgment in an action brought by Albert Logiurato against ACTION, et al. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants have deprived him of his First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment rights by drugging, repatriating, and hospitalizing him against his will. Subject matter jurisdiction is initially based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331. See Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 99 S.Ct. 2264, 60 L.Ed.2d 846 (1979). The status of the parties may be summarized as follows:
Plaintiff is an individual who…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Darrell R. Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- 325-343 E. 56TH STREET CORP. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
- Farm & City Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Donohoe v. WattDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Lederman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.