Legal Opinion

Farm & City Insurance Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 1993No. 93-52PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The main issue we must decide in this case is whether a newly acquired vehicle is a “covered auto” under an insurance policy. Specifically, we must determine whether an insured receives automatic coverage for thirty days after becoming the owner of a vehicle even though he does not request coverage for the vehicle as required by the terms of his policy. Both the insured and the insurer filed motions for summary judgment in this case. The district court denied the insurer’s motion and granted the insured’s motion. We reverse.

I. Background Facts.

On the night of May 16, 1992, or…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. Fees v. Mutual Fire & Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  3. Thompson v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lyon v. WillieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. Hoffman v. Illinois Nat. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. Crippen v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Modern Equipment Company, a Nebraska Corporation v. Continental Western Insurance Company, Inc., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. Benavides v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API