Legal Opinion

Stout v. Gaar, Scott & Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1901No. 3,709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From tlie Hendricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Appellee brought suit against appellants upon certain promissory notes and for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage securing them. The court was requested to find the facts specially and to state conclusions of law thereon, and attempted to do so, but through some oversight neither the finding nor the conclusions were signed. They must therefore be considered as a general finding. Service v. Gambrel, 110 Ind. 349. There was no finding of the amount due to the plaintiff. The judgment appealed from is for $956.87, balance due of principal and interest, and $62.85 attorney’s fees," making a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BucklenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Fruits v. ElmoreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Service v. GambrelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Pub. Serv. Com. v. Marion C. Ct.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ullman v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Moore v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Beatty-Nickle Oil Co. v. SmethersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Public Service Commission v. Marion Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API