Service v. Gambrel
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Hancock Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.
The appellant discusses the questions arising on the special finding and no others, and, under the long settled practice, must be deemed to have waived all other questions.
The appellees contend that the special finding is not properly a part of the record. This contention must prevail. There is neither a bill of exceptions nor a special order making the finding a part of the record, nor is the finding signed by the judge who tried the case, and it can not be regarded as anything more than a general finding. Peoria, etc., Ins. Co. v. Walser, 22 Ind. 73; McClellan v. Bond, 92 Ind. 424, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- McClellan v. BondIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wallace v. KirtleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. State ex rel. HamillIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Ferris v. UdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Winstandley v. BreyfogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Stout v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Galvin v. SyfersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.