Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Bucklen
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 12, 1894No. 905PublishedCited by 21 opinions
From the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellees brought this action against the appellant, and alleged, in their complaint, that the appellant executed the following described note or contract, to wit:
“$500. Elkhart, Ind., May 20, 1890.
“For value received, I promise to pay to S. D. Kim-hark, or order, the sum of five hundred dollars, payable ■at the First National Bank, Elkhart, Ind., with eight per cent, interest after maturity and attorney’s fees, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws. This note is given in consideration that said payee will remove and locate his entire manufacturing establishment to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Indiana Insurance v. CapehartIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Thames Loan & Trust Co. v. BevilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Minnich v. DarlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harrison v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- American Employers' Insurance v. CornellIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Wysong v. NealisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Parrish v. Terre Haute Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Thornburg v. BuckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1885
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.