Fruits v. Elmore
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.
The appellee was the plaintiff and the appellants the defendants in the court below. The action was to recover the possession of a certain horse. There was a trial by jury, and the appellee had judgment in her favor against all the appellants. The appellants have severally assigned errors in this court. The first error discussed by counsel is that the court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the second paragraph of the separate answer of Noah Fruits. In this paragraph, said appellant pleaded, that he was the duly qualified and act*279ing constable of Ripley township, in Montgomery county, and that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cincinnati & Chicago Railroad v. WashburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Branch v. WisemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Trout v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Lane v. SparksIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Smith v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. BucklenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Thornburg v. BuckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1885
- Peoples State Bank v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Moore v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Stout v. Gaar, Scott & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.