Legal Opinion

Ullman v. Thompson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 1914No. 8,380PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Prom Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Ernest L. Thompson against Joseph A. Ullman. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

The questions involved in this appeal may be comprehended from a statement of the special finding, the material part of which is, in substance, as follows • On March 28, 1910, appellee and Landis M. Brice, as first parties, and appellant, as second party, entered into a contract in writing. The contract recited that all the parties lived in Bluffton, Wells County, Indiana; that the United States patent office had theretofore granted to first parties, under a certain number, a patent on a fence brace, but that the letters patent had not been issued. By the contract, first parties granted to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Sandage v. Studabaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Turney v. WiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Holbrook v. NicholIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Hankey v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jensen v. PritchardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Perbal v. Dazor Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Young v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Fletcher American National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Rieke Metal Products Co. v. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API