Legal Opinion
United States v. Hart
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 14, 2008No. 07-0247/AFPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERDMANN delivered the opinion of the court.
Two days after Airman First Class Dustin M. Hart received his Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), but before he received separation pay, his command stopped processing the computation of his final pay and revoked his DD Form 214. Several weeks later various drug charges were preferred against him. We granted review of this case to consider whether the charge and specifications must be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. 65 M.J. 322 (C.A.A.F.2007).
*274Pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1168(a) (2000), a servieemember may not be discharged from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Steven GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. NettlesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. FryCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.