Legal Opinion

United States v. King

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 10, 1995No. 94-0162; CMR No. 9202230PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge:

1. Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted of unauthorized absence (29 days), presenting a false claim, and conspiracy to make a false claim, in violation of Articles 86, 132, and 81, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 932, and 881, respectively. The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, 8 months’ confinement, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. On April 15,1993, the Court of Military Review * affirmed the findings and sentence. 37 MJ 520. We granted review on the following issue:

WHETHER…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. BatchelderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  5. United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. MelansonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  4. Vanderbush v. SmithArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. KeelsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API