Legal Opinion
United States v. Estrada
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 7, 2010No. 09-0822; Crim.App. No. 20070778PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case requires us once again to consider the interaction between administrative dis*46charges of military personnel and punitive discharges adjudged by courts-martial. This Court and the Courts of Criminal Appeals have seen a number of these eases, which usually arise in the context of personal jurisdiction over the appellant. See, e.g., United States v. Hart, 66 M.J. 273 (C.A.A.F.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 310, 172 L.Ed.2d 153 (2008); United States v. Harmon, 63 M.J. 98 (C.A.A.F.2006); Smith v. Vanderbush, 47 M.J. 56…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. CustisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- Smith v. VanderbushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. KruseNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. WittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.