Legal Opinion

State v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1972No. 133PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the heading “Grouping of Exceptions and Assignments of Error,” defendant lists five assignments of error. There are no exceptions in the record and none of the five assignments are based upon exceptions.

An assignment of error is ineffectual unless based on an exception duly noted in apt time. State v. Greene, 278 N.C. 649, 180 S.E. 2d 789 (1971); State v. Rogers, 275 N.C. 411, 168 S.E. 2d 345 (1969); Vance v. Hampton, 256 N.C. 557, 124 S.E. 2d 527 (1962); 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error § 24. Questions not embraced in an exception duly taken at the trial may not be presented…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Vance v. HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API