Legal Opinion

State v. Stone

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1985No. 847SC337Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant’s initial contention is that the trial court erred in excluding evidence of specific acts committed by the victim which would have shown that the victim had a propensity for danger and violence. This assignment is not supported by an exception duly taken at trial and therefore presents no question for appellate review. State v. Green, 280 N.C. 431, 185 S.E. 2d 872 (1972); Rule 10, Rules of Appellate Procedure. Nevertheless, upon examination of the record, we find the exclusion of defendant’s evidence proper.

Defendant contends the trial court excluded evidence that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. AllmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API