Legal Opinion

Vance v. Hampton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1962No. 163PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

An assignment of error not supported by an exception is ineffectual. Barnette v. Woody, 242 N.C. 424, 88 S.E. 2d 223. Here, no exception appears in the entire case on appeal. Hence, there is no basis for the assignments of error appellant attempts to set forth; and no question of law is presented to this Court for decision. Rigsbee v. Perkins, 242 N.C. 502, 87 S.E. 2d 926; Tynes v. Davis, 244 N.C. 528, 94 S.E. 2d 496. See Rules 19(3) and 21, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, et seq. Purported exceptions appearing nowhere except in the assignments of error will not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnette v. WoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Rigsbee v. PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Tynes v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. In Re the Appeal of Reeves Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Clark Equipment Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. RorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API