State v. Roberts
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress the in-court identification of defendant by Miss Fahey. Defendant contends the prosecutrix saw her assailant for only two 6r three minutes during which time she was beaten about the face. Therefore, defendant argues, Miss Fahey is not competent to identify him as her assailant. This assignment is not supported by an exception duly taken at trial and therefore presents no question for appellate review. State v. Green, 280 N.C. 431, 185 S.E. 2d 872 (1972); State v. Jacobs, 278 N.C. 693, 180 S.E. 2d 832…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.