Legal Opinion

In Re McCord

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2000No. 84S00-9806-DI-313PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney William R. McCord represented a client before the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit when he was not admitted to practice before that tribunal. His efforts to litigate his client’s case there were so replete with missed deadlines and other procedural deficiencies that the court ultimately dismissed the appeal and barred the respondent from practicing before the court. We find today that those actions violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law and that they warrant the respondent’s suspension from the practice of law.

Our jurisdiction in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of GerdeIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Consolidated Matter of ChristoffIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Matter of GeislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Matter of LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re ShullIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API