Legal Opinion

Matter of Geisler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1993No. 75S00-9105-DI-374PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, David M. Geisler, was charged in a complaint for disciplinary action with engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice by obstructing the prosecuting attorney's access to evidence, in violation of Rules 3.4(a), 8.4(c) and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and Rule 7-102(A)(7) of the preceding Code of Professional Responsibility. The disciplinary charges arose out of his representing Larry Baughman on child molesting charges. This court appointed the Honorable Daniel Molter as hearing officer who heard the evidence and tendered his report on findings…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Watkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In the Matter of WiremanIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. WunschelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Town Council of New Harmony v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fletcher Whaley Long v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Matter of BarrattIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re SiegelIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lester Sumrall v. LeSEA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API