Legal Opinion

In Re Quinn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2000No. 49S00-9902-DI-129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Today we find that the respondent, James P. Quinn, should be suspended from the practice of law for commingling his personal funds with those of his clients and allowing the balance in his client trust account to fall below an amount sufficient to satisfy outstanding obligations of his clients.

This attorney disciplinary matter has come before this Court for final resolution upon the hearing officer’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The hearing officer concluded that the respondent engaged in misconduct as charged. The respondent, pursuant to Ind. Admission and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of GoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of ShumateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re KourosIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Matter of TowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re McCordIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re LoosemoreIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re LoosemoreIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API