Legal Opinion

Consolidated Matter of Christoff

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1997No. 23S00-9410-DI-983, 23S00-9508-DI-962PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

By threatening to renew a long-dormant criminal investigation against a political candidate seeking the office occupied by incumbent prosecutor Richard M. Holmes, unless the candidate opted to forgo Ms bid to seek the office, Holmes and his chief deputy, Mark S. Christoff, violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law.

The present disciplinary action agamst respondent Mark S. Christoff began on October 19, 1994, when the Disciplmary Commission filed a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action alleging that Christoff violated Ind. Professional Conduct Rule…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lazarus Department Store v. SutherlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Matter of KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of GemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Matter of ConwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Matter of MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. In Re SiegelIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In Re ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Matter of CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API