In Re Shull
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent, Frederick H. Shull, intentionally skipped seven court proceedings at which he was scheduled to appear to defend his client against criminal charges. The respondent later testified he purposely missed the hearings in an attempt to stall the case and gain dismissal of the charges. The charges, in fact, were dismissed, prompting the respondent to testify that he should be “complimented” for his delay tactics. He is wrong. We suspend the respondent from the practice of law for six months for this professional misconduct.
Having been admitted to the bar of this…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re MearsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of CampbellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re McCordIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
4Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MooresIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- In re KinnardIndiana Supreme Court · 2007