Legal Opinion

Matter of Wade

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1984No. 839DC1047PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Respondent first contends that the trial court erred by failing to suppress the inculpatory statement made by him during an in-custody interrogation. He contends that his statement was not voluntarily given, that he was not advised of his right to have a parent present, and he was not advised of his right to counsel.

During the proceedings, the trial judge conducted a voir dire hearing to determine whether respondent had knowingly, willingly, and understandingly waived his rights. Officer Ramsey testified that he read respondent his juvenile rights, that respondent indicated he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. SilverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. In Re WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re EadesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. In re Z.T.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Matter of WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. In the Matter of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Matter of MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API