In Re Walker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Appellant Valerie Walker contends that she had a constitutional right to counsel at the hearing on the initial petition alleging her to be an undisciplined child. We first consider whether the Constitution affords her such right.
In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 18 L.Ed. 2d 527, 87 S.Ct. 1428 (1967), the United States Supreme Court held, inter alia, that “the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires that in respect of proceedings to determine delinquency which may result in commitment to an institution in which the juvenile’s freedom is curtailed, the child and his…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- In re D.L.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Matter of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- District of Columbia v. B. J. R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.