Matter of Walker
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Each respondent contends on appeal that the trial court erred by failing to state affirmatively, in the juvenile adjudication orders, that the allegations of the juvenile petitions had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As to each respondent, the court made a similar finding of fact: “[T]he Court after hearing all the evidence finds the allegations to be true.” The State concedes that the court’s failure to state the standard of proof used in making the determinations of delinquency constitutes reversible error and we agree. G.S. 7A-635 requires that the allegations of a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BarnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. MyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Matter of DulaneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re EadesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- In re K.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re B.E.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- In re: I.W.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- In re C.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.