Legal Opinion
Stone and Michaud Ins., Inc. v. Bank Five for Sav.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 6, 1992No. Civ. 90-485-DPublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
In this civil action, an insurance agency seeks recovery of more than $95,000 for unpaid insurance premiums for coverage provided for a real estate development. Plaintiff contends that Bank Five for Savings (“Bank”), is liable for the monies owed because the relationship existing between the insured and Bank allegedly went beyond that of borrower and lender and was actually a partnership or joint venture. Plaintiff's . amended complaint (“complaint”) 1 sets forth three counts: assump-sit, partner in law, and partner in fact. Diversity jurisdiction is properly based…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Herbert E. Martz v. Union Labor Life Insurance Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Local No. 48, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Doukas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Tingley Systems, Inc. v. Bay State HMO Management, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
- Total Waste Management Corp. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Nedder v. Rivier CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.