Legal Opinion
United States v. James Malcolm Archer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 21, 1995No. 93-2216PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
Defendant James Malcolm Archer appeals after sentencing on his guilty plea to one count of bank fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344(1) and 2. 1 He contends that we must remand for resen-tencing because the district court (1) failed to assure that defendant and his counsel timely received and had the opportunity to review and object to his presentence report (PSR), as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 32, and (2) denied his allocution rights under Fed. R.Crim.P. 32(a)(1)(C). 2
I
The original PSR applied the 1992 Sentencing Guidelines, and calculated a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Willie Lee Franklin, Jerome Mann, Willie R. Anderson and Andrea Y. MannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leo Orlando MunizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Roberto Rangel-ArreolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Juan Hernandez FloresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MarreroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Virgen-ChavarinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Landeros-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. RobergeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.