Legal Opinion

United States v. Romero

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2007No. 06-2052PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Daniel Romero appeals the fifty-seven month sentence imposed by the district court following his plea of guilty to one count of reentry of a deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a)(1), (a)(2) and (b)(2). Romero argues that the district court erred in failing to address his request for a below-Guidelines sentence based on cultural assimilation and in failing adequately to ascertain that he, as well as his attorney, had been provided an opportunity to review the presentence investigation report. We exercise…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. VillafuerteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Jose Flores-MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Martinez-BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API