United States v. Landeros-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Bias Landeros-Lopez (“Landeros”) pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to traffic in methamphetamine. On appeal, Landeros argues that the district court failed to elicit a sufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea and denied him the right to speak at sentencing. Our decision today clarifies this circuit’s factual basis standard and explains the contours of the right of allocution. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, we affirm Landeros’ conviction, but vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.
I
Landeros came to the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Bustamante-ConchasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RauschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.