Legal Opinion
United States v. Roberto Rangel-Arreola
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1993No. 91-2190PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Roberto Rangel-Arreola was convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to do the same in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2.' On appeal, Mr. Roberto Rangel contends there was insufficient evidence to convict him on the conspiracy charge, and further alleges the district court erred by excluding evi dence, by declining to recognize his “minimal role” in the offense, and by failing to require strict compliance with Fed. R.Crim.P. 32. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the district court.
I.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Arthur OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Wallace HooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. SolteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Dwayne StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce R. WEST, Sr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.