Legal Opinion

United States v. Virgen-Chavarin

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 3, 2003No. 02-8052, 02-8076PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

A grand jury indicted Martin Jimenez-Oliva (“Martin”), Miguel Virgen Chavarin (“Chavarin”), Aurelio Topete-Plascencia (“Topete”), Melchor Jimenez-Oliva (“Melchor”), Laurencio Jimenez-Oli-va (“Laurencio”), Lorenzo G. Delgado (“Delgado”), Roberto Montoan-Herrera (“Herrera”), Angel Contreras-Castellanos (“Castellanos”), and Joseph Ramirez (“Ramirez”) for various violations of Titles 8, 18, and 21 of the United States Code. 1 The Indictment charged Chavarin with (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and to distribute, methamphetamine and cocaine, (2)…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Bonard Ray DeninnoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. SayadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Salazar-SamaniegaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. PaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API