Kruta v. Lough
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Scott county to recover a balance of $676.06 for services rendered. The case was tried before Morrison, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $147. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action by plaintiff to recover for services rendered the defendant. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
*141. The plaintiff was a farm laborer and worked for the defendant on his farm. In his complaint he alleges that his services were rendered for the agreed price of $1.75 per day, and further alleges that their reasonable value was a like amount. The defendant denied an agreed price such as was claimed by the plaintiff, and offered evidence tending to show that a part of the services were performed at an agreed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Smith v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Meyer v. SaterbakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lufkin v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Schimmelpfennig v. GaedkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Northwestern Marble & Tile Co. v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 9Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Confer Bros. v. CurrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.