Legal Opinion
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 9
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 1, 1926No. 25,255PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This is an application by the county of Big Stone for a writ prohibiting the district court of that county from exercising further jurisdiction in certain drainage proceedings now known and designated as Judicial Ditch No. 9.
A petition for the construction of a county ditch was presented to the board of county commissioners of Big Stone county in 1911, and the board made an order establishing the ditch and designating it as County Ditch No. 9. Certain objectors appealed to the district . court which reversed the order of the board on the ground that the proceeding contemplated the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sharp v. MaliaIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hardy v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Bonfoy v. GoarIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- McMillan v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State ex rel. Boetcher v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Schultz v. County of ChippewaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- In Re Improvement and Repair of Judicial Ditch No. 10Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.