Legal Opinion
Schimmelpfennig v. Gaedke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 9, 1947No. 34,345PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after verdict in favor of defendant.
The questions for decision are: (1) Whether as a matter of law a real estate broker procures a purchaser of land where he finds a prospective buyer, sends the buyer to the principal, informs the principal that the buyer is coming, and the buyer on the same day purchases the real estate from the principal at the price demanded by the principal; and (2) whether plaintiff, suing under a common count for the value of services rendered in procuring a purchaser for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harmon v. Alfred Peats Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Ylijarvi v. BrockphalerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Sturtevant v. Fiss, Doerr & Carroll Horse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Benedict v. PfunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Smith v. StowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- In Re STEVENSON ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. Charles W. STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STEVENSON ASSOCIATES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Neff v. World Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Consolidated Oil & Gas, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.