Legal Opinion

Avery v. Wadlington

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 9, 1974No. 26351PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

Under our new comparative negligence statute, the trial court refused to allow an explanation or any comment to the jury by plaintiff’s counsel of the effect of its determination of the percentage of negligence by the defendant and by the plaintiff. In its special verdict, the jury found 30% negligence by the defendant and 70% negligence by the plaintiff. The trial court thereupon entered judgment for the defendant in accordance with this statute.

Plaintiff Sharon Avery brought this negligence action for injuries sustained by her when her bicycle collided with the side of defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeGroot v. Van AkkerenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Argo v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Herman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Seppi v. BettyIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Woodward v. HaneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Smith v. GizziSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. GiffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API