Smith v. Gizzi
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
Defendant Gizzi requests that we reverse a judgment against him based on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Smith for damages she suffered when her car was struck from the rear by a car driven by defendant. Defendant claims trial court erred in three basic areas: (1) refusing to grant a mistrial due to prejudicial remarks of plaintiff’s counsel in opening statements, (2) admitting certain bills into evidence, and (3) error in instructions. We do not agree and therefore affirm.
The actual events leading to the collision are in direct controversy but are not material to this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- St. John's Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Oller v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Argo v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Avery v. WadlingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.