DeGroot v. Van Akkeren
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The defendants first contend that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in their favor and in refusing to grant their motions to change certain answers of the jury and for judgment in their favor on the verdict as so changed.
In order that these contentions may be understood it will be necessary briefly to summarize the evidence. On July 6, 1936, the plaintiffs’ son, Conway, aged five years eleven months and two days, was fatally injured as a result of his colliding with the right rear wheel of a Chevrolet truck belonging to the partnership and operated at the time by the defendant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TatisosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Banderob v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. JuneauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Schmidt v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Christensen v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Woodward v. HaneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Ceplina v. South Milwaukee School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Collier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Walston v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.