Johnson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred by reason of its refusal to give an instruction informing the jury concerning the effect of the percentage findings in its verdict under our comparative negligence statute.1 The accident occurred prior to the effective date of the recent legislative enactment of § 1-7.7, W.S.1957, 1976 Interim Supp., permitting such advice to the jury, but the trial was held thereafter.2 In its special verdict, the *910jury found the plaintiff seventy percent negligent and the defendants thirty percent negligent, and awarded the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Rickards v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
- Wind River Indian Education Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Miami Water Works Local No. 654 v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- New Central Coal Co. v. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Sorenson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Jahn v. BurnsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Wyoming Community College Commission v. Casper Community College DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.