Legal Opinion

Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. Gifford

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 22, 1983No. 81SC47PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

This appeal presents a case of first impression involving the liability of multiple defendants under the Colorado comparative negligence statute, section 13-21-111, C.R. S.1973. The sole issue is whether the comparative negligence statute should be interpreted to require that the contributory negligence of a plaintiff be compared against the combined negligence of multiple defendants. The court of appeals held that an individual comparison rule is to be applied which requires that the plaintiff’s negligence be compared against the negligence of each defendant individually.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Walker v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Reiter v. DykenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. RidenourWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Laubach v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Kussman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Ferrer v. OkbamicaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
  3. Elder v. OrluckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. FrackeltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Dare v. SobuleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API