Legal Opinion

Pajaro Valley Bank v. Scurich

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1908No. Civ. No. 418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa. Cruz County, refusing to discharge a writ of attachment-Lucas F. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal by defendant, Stephen Scurich, from an order of the trial court, refusing to discharge a writ of attachment as to said defendant, that had been issued in the above-entitled action, and been levied upon property of said defendant as well as upon property of the defendant corporation.

The motion was made under section 556, Code of Civil Procedure, upon the ground that the writ was improperly and irregularly issued as to appellant in this, that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against appellant, and that the affidavit for attachment is insufficient in that it fails…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Hale Bros. v. MillikenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kildare Lumber Co. v. Atlanta BankTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Winters v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Pacific Coast Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. Peterson v. BeggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Armstrong & Co. v. IrizarrySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1921
  4. Anaheim National Bank v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Lowenberg v. L. Jacobson's SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API