Lowenberg v. L. Jacobson's Sons
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing to dissolve an attachment. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment. The complaint set forth that the defendants are residents of the state of New York; that they are engaged in the business of selling clothing and wearing apparel to the trade; that their principal place of business is located in said state; that each of them has been continuously absent from the state from September, 1907, up to and including the month of December, 1911; “that during the month of September, 1907, said plaintiff and said defendants entered into an agreement in writting, made and executed in the state of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- De Leonis v. EtchepareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Dunn v. MackeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Donnelly v. StruevenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamburger v. HalpermCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Bringas v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Higgins v. Desert Braemar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963