Hoffman v. Pacific Coast Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tehama County refusing to dissolve an attachment. John F. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to dissolve attachment.
Appellant rests its appeal upon the sole ground that the “complaint is insufficient to constitute a basis for said attachment,” and this for the reason that the complaint contained no prayer for relief when the levy was made under the writ of attachment.
The action is for money, to wit, the sum of $503.11, alleged to have been paid out to and for defendant at its special instance and request, no part of which has been paid and the same is now due and unpaid. The complaint was filed May 26, 1916, and summons- was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hathaway v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Donovan v. McDevittMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Sannoner v. Jacobson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Petersen v. RidenourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Furia v. HelmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.