Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Kunja Knitting Mills, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 1994No. 2124PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a workers’ compensation case. Margaret Gail Rogers claimed she suffered an occupational disease (contact dermatitis) from contact with “Shima oil” while employed with Kunja Knitting Mills USA, Inc. The single commissioner denied her claim and the full commission affirmed. Rogers petitioned for judicial review and the circuit court reversed. Kunja appeals. We reverse.

Kunja employed Rogers from February 1988 to November 1989 in its knitting department. As part of her employment, Rogers was required to clean knitting machines with the Shima oil. She noticed the oil burned her hands after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stokes v. First National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. McGuffin v. Schlumberger-SangamoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. DeBruhl v. Kershaw County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Sharpe v. Case Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Hendricks v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Pack v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Shatto v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API