Legal Opinion

McGuffin v. Schlumberger-Sangamo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1992No. 23577PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

Respondent filed a claim seeking workers’ compensation benefits contending she injured her back while lifting a tray of parts in the course of her employment with appellant, Schlumberger-Sangamo. The single commissioner awarded benefits. The Full Commission reversed'the award. On petition for judicial review, the Circuit Court reversed, finding the Order of the Full Commission was clearly erroneous in view of the reliable probative and substantial evidence on the whole record. We affirm.

ISSUE

The sole issue is whether the Order of the Full Commission denying benefits is supported…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Ross v. American Red CrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Green v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Sharpe v. Case Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Rogers v. Kunja Knitting Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Hendricks v. Pickens CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API